January 20, 2016


Why Did My Reinforcing Change in ACI 318-14?


The new ACI 318-14 code has been implemented into RISA-3D V14, RISAFloor V10, and RISAFoundation V8. One of the big changes between the ACI 318-11 and the ACI 318-14 was to minimum flexural reinforcement for one-way and two-way slabs, as well as foundation elements.

Why Did My Reinforcing Change in ACI 318 14 1

In many cases this has the effect of increasing the required reinforcement in these elements. Here we will discuss why.

ACI 318-11

In this code the flexural minimums are considered in Section 10.5. Sections 10.5.1 and 10.5.2 are where the minimum flexural reinforcement calculation is looked. For common values of reinforcement and concrete properties this would result in a rho = 0.0033. In Section 10.5.3 there is an additional provision that allows you to disregard 10.5.1 and 10.5.2 as long as the area of steel provided is at least 1/3 greater than required by analysis.

There has always been a bit of gray area as to where this provision is applicable. In RISA this provision is applied to all beam and slab-type elements.

ACI 318-14

This code re-arranged it’s sections to each element type and thus updated/clarified the language for each element.

Section 7.6.1 & 8.6.1 Minimum flexural reinforcement in non-prestressed Slabs.

For 60 ksi reinforcement this would result in rho = 0.0018. However, there is no exception here for the 1/3 greater than analysis. This is the same provision for both one-way and two-way slabs.

Section 9.6.1 Minimum flexural reinforcement in non-prestressed beams

For beam members this language is the same as it was in the ACI 318-11 Section 10.5.

Sections 13.3.2, 13.3.3 & 13.3.4 (one-way shallow foundations, two-way isolated footings, and two-way combined footings and mat foundations)

Each of these sections gives a reference to either Chapter 7 or Chapter 8. For this reason it was assumed that the minimum flexural reinforcement changes were applicable to most foundation elements.

Summary

When using the ACI 318-11 code it was common that the flexural reinforcement minimums were omitted because of the exception in Section 10.5.3. The 4/3’s*Asrequired or Asmin (temperature and shrinkage) would generally govern.

When using the ACI 318-14 code, however, the exception is not allowed and rhomin = 0.0018 is required for any tension face for the elements referenced above.

Thus, for a member in both positive and negative bending rhomin = 0.0018 would need to be met on both faces of the element and thus causes an overall larger amount of reinforcement.

This change is applicable to:

RISAFloor ES

  • Slab Design Strips

RISA-3D

  • Footings

RISAFoundation

  • Slab Design Strips
  • Footings
  • Pile Caps
  • Retaining Wall Footings

Tags: RISA-3D RISAFloor ES RISAFoundation

You may also be interested in

Nov 8, 2018 | Tips & Tricks
Mat Slab Overturning and Sliding Safety Factors

RISAFoundation v11.0 includes two new tabs in the Safety Factors resul...
Read More

Aug 21, 2019 | Tips & Tricks
RISA-3D v18 Sneak Peek Videos

The new release of RISA-3D is right around the corner! Check out our t...
Read More

Jul 12, 2019 | Tips & Tricks
Implementing Realistic Behavior for T/C Members in RISA-3D

Tension or Compression (T/C) Only members are commonly used in steel b...
Read More

Jun 20, 2019 | Tips & Tricks
Understanding Wall Panel Forces with Rigid Diaphragms

Rigid diaphragms represent a plane of very high rigidity and distribut...
Read More