AISC Design Parameters
Cm - Interactive Bending Coefficient
Cm Coefficients are described in Chapter H of the 9th Edition AISC (ASD) code. If these entries are left blank, they will be automatically calculated.
The Cm value is influenced by the sway condition of the member and is dependent on the member's end moments, which will change from one load combination to the next, so it may be a good idea to leave these entries blank.
Cb - Bending Coefficients
Cb Factors are described in Chapter F of the AISC code and are used in the calculation of the nominal flexural strength, Mn. If this entry is left blank, it will be calculated automatically for AISC code checks.
The calculation of Cb is based on the unbraced length of the compression flange and the moment diagram for the unbraced segment in question. If a specific unbraced length is entered by the user, the program cannot interpret the location of brace points and the Cb value will default to '1.0'. In some cases, it may be better to enter 'segment' as the unbraced length for a physical member. When 'segment' is entered, the Cb value will be calculated individually for each segment of the beam based on that segment's moment diagram.
- For members designated as "Tapered WF" shapes, Cb is always calculated per the AISC 360 section F1 equation.
- AISC 9th Ed always assumes Cb = 1.0.
Function for Stiffness Reduction
The Function entry may be set to either 'Lateral' or 'Gravity' using the drop down list in the spreadsheet. If the Adjust Stiffness option is set to Yes on the Codes tab of the Model Settings Dialog, then all members with a 'Lateral' Function will be considered for the stiffness reduction required per the AISC Direct Analysis Method.
The Flexural Stiffness Reduction of the Direct Analysis Method will be applied to all 'Lateral' members. This process involves evaluating certain conditions:
-
Primary Stiffness Adjustment Requirements
The program first checks whether a member satisfies the three primary stiffness adjustment requirements:
-
The member is defined as “Lateral”.
-
The stiffness adjustment option is enabled for the specific material being used.
-
The chosen material code permits stiffness adjustment for the selected material.
-
-
Stiffness Adjustment Calculation
Once the above conditions are met, the software proceeds to calculate the stiffness adjustments for the member. This includes reducing the area and moment of inertia based on predefined multiplication factors:
-
Aluminum Material: Area and moment inertia are multiplied by 0.8.
-
-
Exclusive Criteria
However, certain exclusion criteria are considered to determine whether to apply the stiffness adjustments or not. The following conditions must be met simultaneously for exclusion:
-
The material is Hot Rolled
-
The selected steel code is AISC 13th ed.
-
The member type is not specified as:
-
Column or v-brace for area reduction.
-
Column or beam for moment of inertia reduction.
-
-
If all the exclusion criteria are met, the original area and moment of inertia values will be retained without applying the stiffness adjustment multiplication factors. This ensures that certain types of HR members, when using the AISC code, maintain their original stiffness characteristics.
The program can perform an iterative analysis during the solution depending on the value of τb. In this case, the stiffness matrix is recomputed for each iteration until the value of τb converges within 1 percent for all 'Lateral' members in compression. In the unlikely event that τb is less than zero, the value of τb is considered to be 1.e-5. When used in the analysis, the value for τbwill be listed in the Detail Report for that member.
When the users sets the Adjust Stiffness flag on the Model Settings to Yes (Tau =1.0), then the program will use a Tau of 1.0 in the stiffness analysis and no iteration of the stiffness matrix is necessary. This option is a good feature for models which take a long time to solve or which have not yet been proportioned to control drift.
The Axial Stiffness Reduction of the Direct Analysis Method behaves differently. For the AISC 360-05, 360-10, and 360-16, the reduction will be applied to all 'Lateral' members.
- The stiffness reduction required by the Direct Analysis Method will be ignored if the Adjust Stiffness option is not selected on the Codes tab of the Model Settings, or if the design code chosen does not have an option for stiffness reduction.
- The Direct Analysis Method requires the use of reduced flexural stiffness for all members whose flexural stiffness is considered to contribute to the lateral stability of the structure. This will only apply to members designated as type 'Column' or 'Beam.' If the user assigns type 'None' to the member, the Flexural Stiffness Reduction will not be applied.
- When the Adjust Stiffness flag is set to Yes (Tau=1.0), then the code would requires a higher value for the applied Notional Loads.
Channel Conn.
The type of connection for double channels is reported in the Channel Conn. column. This input is only for back to back channels and is used in the calculation of KL/r.
a - Connector Spacing
For double channels, the connector spacing ‘a’ is used in the calculation of KL/r. This input is only used for back to back channels.
Allowable Stress Increase Factor (ASIF)
AISC 9th Edition
Increasing of allowable stresses may be allowed when forces are transient. You can enter an ASIF factor on the Load Combinations Spreadsheet to allow the increase for a specific load combination. The ASIF factor is then applied to the allowable stresses in accordance with section A5. The ASIF factor also is applied to the Euler values (F'e).
All Other US Codes
Setting the ASIF factor to a value greater than '1.0' will not cause the capacities to be increased by that factor. However, setting the ASIF factor to a value greater than '1.0' is used as a flag to use of the seismic compactness criteria of Table I-8-1 of AISC 341-05 Seismic Provisions of Steel Buildings. Specifically we will use the limiting width-thickness ratios from this table for capacity calculations (for compression flange local buckling for example). In these cases, we use Table I-8-1 of AISC 341-05 as opposed to Table B4.1 of AISC 360-05.
AISC Limitations
AISC 360-16 (15th Ed.)
Wide Flanges:
- Flexural torsional buckling per Chapter E is included when Ltorque is greater than either Lbyy or Lbzz.
- Flange local buckling per Chapter F is only included when the web is compact and the flange is either non-compact or slender.
Rectangular Tubes - Lateral torsional buckling is checked per section F7.4, however this section only applies to strong axis bending.
Code Checks - For combined bending and tension (Section H1.2) the code-allowed modification of Cb is not applied. For combined bending and compression, Section H1.3 is not considered, meaning that the program can be over conservative in some situations.
Single Angles - Single angles in compression are not checked for Section E4 because no standard single angle shapes have a slenderness (b/t) > 20. They are also not checked for Section E5 as there is insufficient information regarding the connections and usage of the member.
WT and LL Shapes - This code does not address the rare case where Lateral Torsional (or Flexural Torsional) Buckling occurs for WT's and double angles bent about their weak axis. Therefore, only yielding is checked for weak axis bending.
Double Channels -Double channel connector spacing requirements are not checked. Additionally, double channel design is only available in AISC 360-16 and AISC 360-10 codes.
AISC 360-05 (13th Ed.) and AISC 360-10 ( 14th Ed.)
Wide Flanges:
- For AISC 360-10, flexural torsional buckling per Chapter E is included when Ltorque is greater than either Lbyy or Lbzz.
- For AISC 360-05, flexural torsional buckling per Chapter E is only included when Ltorque > Lbyy and Ltorque > Lbzz.
- Flange local buckling per Chapter F is only included when the web is compact and the flange is either non-compact or slender.
Code Checks - For combined bending and tension (Section H1.2) the code-allowed modification of Cb is not applied. For combined bending and compression, Section H1.3 is not considered, meaning that the program can be over conservative in some situations.
Single Angles - Single angles in compression are not checked for Section E4 because no standard single angle shapes have a slenderness (b/t) > 20. They are also not checked for Section E5 as there is insufficient information regarding the connections and usage of the member.
WT and LL Shapes:
- This code does not address the rare case where Lateral Torsional (or Flexural Torsional) Buckling occurs for WT's and double angles bent about their weak axis. Therefore, only yielding is checked for weak axis bending.
- For slender WT sections, the compressive capacity is calculated with Qa always assumed equal to 1.0.
ASD 9th Edition Limitations
Wide Flange Shapes - Code checks for shapes that qualify as plate girders, as defined by Chapter G, are not performed. Plate girders that can be checked by the provisions of Chapter F will have code checks calculated.
Channels - The AISC 9th Edition (ASD) specification does not specifically address the allowable stress for weak axis bending of channels. Therefore, the program uses the most similar formula for the weak axis bending of wide flanges (0.75*Fy). For a complete and thorough treatment of channel code checks, refer to the LRFD specification.
WT and LL Shapes - ASD allowable bending stresses calculated for WT and LL shapes use Chapter F for cases when the stem is in compression. This is not technically correct, but the ASD code does not provide direction regarding other means of calculating the allowable bending stress in this situation. In the interim, the LRFD code directly addresses this situation, so it is recommended that you use the LRFD code to check WT and LL shapes that have their stems in compression.
Neither the ASD or LRFD codes address the rare case where Lateral Torsional (or Flexural Torsional) Buckling occurs for WT's and double angles bent about their weak axis.
RE Shapes - Rectangular bar members (on-line shapes) are assigned allowable bending stresses for the yielding limit state only. Lateral torsional buckling is not considered because the ASD code doesn't directly address this for rectangular shapes. The strong axis bending stress is assigned as 0.66*Fy and the weak axis bending stress is assigned as 0.75*Fy. If you have a case where lateral torsional buckling may govern, you should use the LRFD code, since the LRFD code does address this limit state.
LRFD 2nd and 3rd Edition Limitations
Wide Flange Shapes - LRFD code checks for shapes that qualify as plate girders as defined by Chapter G are not performed.
Single Angles - Single angles are only checked for Euler buckling. They are not checked for Flexural-Torsional buckling.
WT and LL Shapes - Neither the ASD or LRFD codes address the rare case where Lateral Torsional (or Flexural Torsional) Buckling occurs for WT's and double angles bent about their weak axis.
Tapered Wide Flanges - ASD 9th edition code checks can be performed on tapered members with equal or unequal top/bottom flanges, with the restriction that the compression flange area must be equal to or larger than the tension flange area. LRFD 2nd edition code checks are limited to tapered members with equal area flanges. Code checks are performed using Appendix F, Chapter F, and Chapter D as applicable. Note that the rate of taper is limited by Appendix F, and the program enforces this. The interaction equations in Appendix F are used to compute the final code check value. These equations also include the effects of weak axis bending, if present.
Prismatic Wide Flanges with Unequal Flanges - ASD code checks for prismatic WF members with unequal flanges are also limited to shapes that have the compression flange area equal to or larger than the tension flange area. LRFD code checks currently cannot be performed for prismatic WF members with unequal flanges.
Pipes and Bars - For pipes and round bars, the code check is calculated based on an SRSS summation of the y and z-axis stresses calculated for the pipe or bar. This is done because these circular shapes bend in a strictly uniaxial fashion and calculating the code check based on a biaxial procedure (as is done for all the other shapes) is overly conservative.
Single Angles - Code checking (LRFD or ASD) on single angle shapes is based on P/A (axial load/axial strength or axial stress/allowable axial stress) only. This is because the load eccentricity information needed for a meaningful bending calculation is not available. Only Euler buckling is considered for single angles, flexural-torsional buckling is NOT considered. Single angles will have the following message displayed on the Code Check Spreadsheet to remind the user of the axial only code check: "Code check based on z-z Axial ONLY"
Please see Single Angle Stresses for more information on the calculation of single angle stresses.
AISC Special Messages
In some instances, code checks are not performed for a particular member. A message explaining why a code check is not possible will be listed instead of the code check value. You can click the cell that contains the message and look to the status bar to view the full message. The following are the messages that may be listed:
This message is displayed when the member is not defined with a database shape, a steel code is not specified on the Model Settings or no units were specified. For LRFD this message is displayed if the steel yield stress is less than 10ksi.
The ratio h/tw exceeds the limiting criteria listed in Table B5.1. This means Chapter G (plate girders) governs.
The axial compressive stress for the member is greater than the Euler buckling stress (per ASD criteria), meaning the member is unstable. A code check can not be calculated.
A tube is failing to meet the depth/width requirements laid out in Section F3-1 of the ASD code. The depth of the tube is the full nominal depth, which the width is taken as the full width minus 3 times the thickness. Section B5-1 specifies this calculation for the width when the fillet radius is not known.
This message appears for ASD code checking when Appendix B calculations are being done for a Tee or Channel shape and the shape fails to meet the requirements of Table A-B5.1, Limiting Proportions for Channels and Tees.
This message appears when Appendix B calculations are being done for a pipe shape and the diameter/thickness ratio exceeds the limit of 13000/Fy specified in Section B5-b for ASD, Section B5-3b for LRFD.
Section B7 recommends that KL/r for compression members not exceed 200. For the ASD 9th edition code, a procedure is presented to handle when KL/r exceeds 200. Thus, for ASD 9th edition, KL/r>200 is permitted. For all other AISC codes no guidance is provided as to what to do if KL/r>200, so exceeding this limit is not permitted.
The limitations of Appendix F for the design of web tapered members include the restriction that the flange area shall be constant along the length of the member. This member's flange area changes along its length. See Appendix Section F7.1 (b).
The limitations of Appendix F for the design of web tapered members include a limit on how steep the rate of taper can be along the member length. This member's taper rate exceeds the limit given by equation A-F7-1. See Appendix Section F7.1 (c).
The requirements for Wide Flange members with unequal flanges in the LRFD, Appendix F1, are not addressed.
The limitations of Appendix F for the design of web-tapered members include the restriction that the flange areas of the top and bottom flange must be equal. The compression flange may be larger than the tension flange. However equation A-F7-4 is unconservative for cases where the compression flange is smaller than the tension flange. See Appendix Sections F7.1 (b) and F7.4.